![]() ![]() mandokava it differs by the absence of postnasals (versus present), a lower number of ventrals (91 – 96 versus 103 – 120) and paravertebrals (95 – 101 versus 129 – 141), by the uniform dark dorsal and light ventral coloration (versus complex patterns, including dark transversal dark stripes in the anterior part of body). ardouini it differs by the absence of postnasals (versus presence), a higher number of scale rows around midbody (32 – 36 versus 31 – 33), shorter fingers with a lower number of lamellae under fourth finger (6 – 8 versus 7 – 10) and toe (9 – 13 versus 17 – 21), a uniform dark dorsal and light ventral coloration (versus complex patterns, including dark transversal dark stripes in the anterior part of body). 5 E – H) it can be distinguished by showing significantly shorter limbs in proportion to body size smaller size (SVL max = 150 mm versus 212 mm) a less prominent parietal area and more compact head a lower number of ventral scales (91 – 96 versus 95 – 108) and of scale rows around midbody (32 – 36 versus 39 – 41) absence of postnasal by the uniform dark dorsal and light ventral coloration (versus complex patterns). 4 A, 5 A – D) by showing significantly shorter fingers and toes with lower numbers of lamellae under fourth finger (6 – 8 versus 10 – 13) and fourth toe (11 – 13 versus 15 – 21) a smaller size (SVL max = 150 mm versus 226 mm) more compact head a lower number of ventrals (91 – 96 versus 99 – 113) absence of postnasal presubocular frequently absent (versus always present, most often two on each sides). crenni), the new species can be distinguished from the superficially similar Amphiglossus astrolabi (see fig. Within Amphiglossu s, it is distinguished from all the other species by a combination of (1) a relatively large size (SVL of adults from 126 to 150 mm) (2) a characteristic pattern of coloration with dark / grey dorsum contrasting with bright orange to yellowish flanks and ventrum, including the ventral side of the tail (3) absence of a postnasal scale (4) presubocular frequently absent, (5) presence of a single elongated tertiary temporal bordering lower secondary temporal. Within the Amphiglossus / Madascincus group, it is placed in the lineage called Amphiglossus (sensu Crottini et al. A member of the phenetic Amphiglossus / Madascincus group which differs (1) from the Malagasy genera in the subfamily Lygosominae (Cryptoblepharus and Trachylepis) by the presence of entirely movable and scaly eyelids (versus fused immovable eyelids forming spectacles over the eyes in Cryptoblepharus or movable eyelids with a translucent disk or window in the lower eyelid in Trachylepis), absence of prefrontals (present in both Cryptoblepharus and Trachylepis), and lack of frontoparietal scales (present in Trachylepis) (2) from all the other Malagasy scincine genera by the presence of four legs. uma aliança para o conhecimento da biodiversidadeĭiagnosis.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |